EWPG explained

These two points are clearly defined in the law. The holder is the person who is entered as the owner in the electronic securities register, while the beneficiary is the person who holds the right arising from a security.

Who can be entered as a holder in the electronic securities register depends on whether a collective entry or an individual entry is to be made:

In the case of a collective entry (electronic counterpart to securities evidenced by individual or collective certificates held in collective custody), a securities clearing and deposit bank (custodian) is the registered holder of electronic securities. In this case, therefore, the formal holders are not the same as holders of rights (material beneficiaries), unless the electronic securities are the own holdings of the collective securities depository or custodian bank registered as the holder. In order to carry out a collective registration with crypto securities nevertheless, there is the omnibus wallet solution. Here, there are several investors behind a token, which in turn are managed by a custodian. With the custodian, it is important that a custodian license is available.

In the case of a single registration, any natural person or legal entity, or partnership with legal capacity, can be the holder of the electronic securities. Unlike in the case of a collective registration, the (formal) holder is regularly also the (material) beneficiary of the electronic security (personal union).

Yes, but it is worded “openly” in several respects. The government draft is clearly intended to preserve the current status quo, but also to create new opportunities. The aim is to be able to take advantage of the benefits of electronic securities without major conversion effort. To this end, the new regulations to be created should fit as smoothly as possible into existing civil and supervisory law. In particular, the use of electronic securities will not be “prescribed,” but rather offered as an option.

Those who do not make use of it can issue securities in the usual way using the established and well-functioning process. Those who do make use of it, however, can be assured of the continued validity of previous, highly developed legal principles through the applicability of property law, and thus have extensive legal certainty when entering the new terrain. Furthermore, the aim is to anticipate the market as little as possible, i.e. merely to create a certain framework in which the market can develop. This is done against the background that both the market and the technology are still in the development stage, despite all the progress that has been made.

The legislative materials also show that further digitization is at least being considered by the legislature. In the course of its deliberations on the eWpG, for example, the German government was expressly called upon to evaluate the new regulations after just three years and to make proposals for regulations on the introduction of electronic shares at the beginning of the next legislative period.